here is the ad:

These groups really need to stop calling everone anti-semites. It's hard to take them seriously when they think everything that doesn't agree with their ideals is anti-semitism.
And I wouldn't put the ad in either, since most of those groups are for creating MORE settlements in the West Bank, ruining the lives of MORE Palestinians, and helping create MORE suicide bombers.

So, you wouldn't run the ad because of differing politics?
To be honest, I think they were thinking the same thing when they chose not to run it.
Political bias seeps into all, it seems.

But, frankly, I don't have a high opinion of these types of magazines. I find them extremely condescending. I'd be incredibly offended by anyone trying to "empower" my sex, race, religion, any other group, etc. I don't need publications congradulating any little accomplishment I need.

The biggest respect I can pay to successful women is treating them like I would any other successful person. Clapping my hands and fawning them with praise for any little thing they do like I would to a child learning to walk is degrading. Of course a woman can be a CEO, and of course she can do the job well. Do you really need a "yay, look what we can do, mommy" magazine to prove it?

ahh, well... I digress.

Well, they make the magazine, so they have the right to not publish something with a different political view than their own.

Simple, Israel politics and ways of doing things makes the nazi's look like pansys.


so I get negativly pointed for telling the truth?

absolutely. But pretending your not political while making those choices is a bit two-faced.

"She said that because two of the women photographed belong to the same political party, the advertisement showed favoritism. She added that an upcoming issue would feature a two-page profile of Ms. Livni."

And profiling just one of them DOESN'T show favoritism?!

True. I was implying if they hadn't tried to explain it with that stupid reasoning.