Testing may kill animals needlessly : RSS 2.0http://www.plime.com/en-usplime.com2009, plime.com.Plime/1http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rssTesting may kill animals needlessly : RSS 2.0http://www.plime.com/images/logo.gifhttp://www.plime.com/<![CDATA[Testing may kill animals needlessly]]>http://www.plime.com/science/l/57975/1/http://www.plime.com/science/l/57975/1/plime.com
  comments (9)  share edit history (0)
< 1 >
<![CDATA[gammerus @ 4/13/2008 4:19:41 AM]]>Allergan officials say they have no choice.Not choice? Because the only option other than poisoning animals it to let someone age naturally?]]>http://www.plime.com/l/57975/1/rss2_0.rss#q10http://www.plime.com/l/57975/1/rss2_0.rss#q10plime.com <![CDATA[gratheo @ 4/12/2008 9:44:34 PM]]>It's sick and depraved.
I'm against animal testing generally, but for something like this?
WTF, humanity. WTF.]]>http://www.plime.com/l/57975/1/rss2_0.rss#q9http://www.plime.com/l/57975/1/rss2_0.rss#q9plime.com <![CDATA[eLJay @ 4/12/2008 9:35:10 PM]]>« Rowangrey : Maybe we should make a law that any old harpy wanting to get Botox injections should have to watch the dog die before the doctor will treat her.
That'd clear this s**t up right quick (in most cases).They would probably just shrug. I'll admit to being vein, but not even if I could afford it would I do this. And the fact, that they are testing animals--which I did not know--is sick.]]>http://www.plime.com/l/57975/1/rss2_0.rss#q8http://www.plime.com/l/57975/1/rss2_0.rss#q8plime.com <![CDATA[mobase @ 4/12/2008 9:23:07 PM]]>« dollyllama : These tests are not for medical purposes, these are used for cosmetics and toiletries. These are unnecessary tests.They're "nessesary" (sarcasm intended) only because there are several thousand slavering lawyers out there, waiting for them to screw up.]]>http://www.plime.com/l/57975/1/rss2_0.rss#q7http://www.plime.com/l/57975/1/rss2_0.rss#q7plime.com <![CDATA[Rowangrey @ 4/12/2008 10:13:53 AM]]>That'd clear this s**t up right quick (in most cases).]]>http://www.plime.com/l/57975/1/rss2_0.rss#q6http://www.plime.com/l/57975/1/rss2_0.rss#q6plime.com <![CDATA[thenegativeone @ 4/12/2008 10:11:49 AM]]>Blatantly at the LD:50 animals suffer what I can only assume is a horrendous death. All so a few over the hill rich people can look a few years younger.]]>http://www.plime.com/l/57975/1/rss2_0.rss#q5http://www.plime.com/l/57975/1/rss2_0.rss#q5plime.com <![CDATA[2manyusernames @ 4/12/2008 9:47:41 AM]]>
The testing of things such as botox so some vain a*****e can have fewer wrinkles should be criminal.

Of course it isn't just things like this. Look at the infamous IAMS controversy. This seems to be one of the few times that PETA isn't acting insane and has it right.

http://www.iamscruelty.com/index.asp


not embedding the video, click on it if you want to watch
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wsOoChqZ8ZE


Of course they deny it.
http://www.iamsagainstcruelty.com/iac/jsp/index.jsp

http://www.truthorfiction.com/rumors/i/iams.htm
]]>http://www.plime.com/l/57975/1/rss2_0.rss#q4http://www.plime.com/l/57975/1/rss2_0.rss#q4plime.com <![CDATA[doggylives @ 4/12/2008 9:33:52 AM]]>http://www.plime.com/l/57975/1/rss2_0.rss#q3http://www.plime.com/l/57975/1/rss2_0.rss#q3plime.com <![CDATA[dollyllama @ 4/12/2008 9:12:12 AM]]>An e-mail exchange last summer between the panel's chair and other government scientists reinforced the suspicions of animal advocates that panel members are resistant to newer tests. In the exchange, copies of which were obtained by The Washington Post, the scientists discussed two recent papers by a prominent European researcher favoring an alternative approach known as evidence-based toxicology. One scientist asked what they could do "to combat these papers."These tests are not for medical purposes, these are used for cosmetics and toiletries. These are unnecessary tests.]]>http://www.plime.com/l/57975/1/rss2_0.rss#q2http://www.plime.com/l/57975/1/rss2_0.rss#q2plime.com