R. Kelly not guilty on all counts
R. Kelly not guilty on all counts
R & B singer R. kelly has been in court over the last six
years fighting 14 counts of child pron for alledgely bieng the man in question on a sex tape with what was supposed to be a 13yr old girl. picked by nesbyniccolo 4 months ago
tags r. kelly sex tape chicago singer
33
 quote edit #1 
  comments (7)  share edit history (1)
< 1 >
39
 2manyuse...
4 months ago
See boys and girls $$$$$ = freedom to anything you want. Murder, child molestation. Anything at all.

Isn't America great?

Gag
48
quote #2
17
 nesbynic...
4 months ago
« 2manyusernames : See boys and girls $$$$$ = freedom to anything you want. Murder, child molestation. Anything at all.

Isn't America great?

Gag
even though i might feel like he was doing something like this i still can't say for certain that he is on the tape. the jurors felt the same way. You have to prove these things beyond a reasonable doubt. Plus the tape in question had be circulated thru boot legging for 5 years. Honestly i didn't even think he would get a fair trial
0
quote #3
11
 jLoSsDh
4 months ago
I haven`t read the article yet, but on NPR they said that the man in the video had a mole on his back that Kelley doesn`t have.
0
quote #4
16
 ImNotBlu...
4 months ago
I think this gives him a 1-Up on Michael Jackson (MJ was never caught on video).

BUT, he's still under OJ Simpson... there was DNA evidence for that one!

And all I can think of is David Chappelle.

"I'm gonna pee on you... Drip drip drip..."

Hahaha... classic.
0
quote #5
About Plime
Plime is an editable wiki community where users can add and edit weird and interesting links. Users earn karma when other users vote on their actions. The more karma you have, the more power you have at Plime.
12
 bingo
4 months ago
Is anyone surprised?
0
quote #6
11
 mewhiten...
4 months ago
I thought this ended years ago....I don't really know enough about the case to say he's guilty for sure, he may be rich and famous, but that doesn't always mean he's guilty of all he is accused of. His music is still horrible though.
0
quote #7
39
 2manyuse...
4 months ago
He is most definitely guilty. This isn't the first time he has skated on such charges. He has been accused of molesting children before. There was even photographic proof, but it was thrown out due to an illegal search.

There have been lawsuits settled out of court and more.

The man is definitely a child molester but too many are willing to deny it to themselves and/or look the other way because he can sing.

That being said, it seems to be a fair acquittal even though many of the jurors felt strongly it was him in the tape.

The main problem is the prosecutors failed to prove that the young girl was his goddaughter.

Since they didn't prove the identity of the victim, you can't convict him on charges of child molestation.
0
quote #8
+ add a comment
< 1 >

copyright Worth1000, LLC