There is no justice when this tramp can make tens of thousands of dollars to show her nasty bits, when she originally was probably showing them for free. Thanks Southwest Airlines.

In other news, it's probably a good time to go flying just for all the eye candy from the copy cat tramps.

Why go flying when you can just buy her Playboy when it comes out, Alton? Geez.

Maybe it's just me, but I don't want to promote this type of behavior. I won't buy this Playboy (not that I ever do) cause I don't think seeing her naked is worth what she is getting paid.

Maybe I'm just jealous.

Does anybody think this will help her or hurt her if she becomes a lawyer?

I think this is an odd way to prove that her clothing wasn't too provocative.

can someone tell me why she's being cradled by Richard Branson? Did I miss the nod in the article?

Ah.. I went a little further. GREAT PR move by Branson. He's a freaking genuis without the massive ego in tow.

Ummm... when does the issue come out?

"Ebbert worked at a Hooters in San Diego but said wants to become an attorney, and doesn't think posing nude should get in the way of her professional aspirations."


Just because she thinks it shouldn't, doesn't mean it won't. She's an idiot for thinking otherwise.


Every time I have ever heard anything about her in the news, all I get from it is this: "Attention world! I am an attention whore! And I'm hot! Look at me, I got kicked off a plane for flaunting my hotness!" And now: "Buy my issue of Playboy!"

I'm all for having brains and beauty, it's a brilliant combination and those lucky enough to have it are... well, lucky. But be smart about it. Realize that flashing your goods to the world may gain you some degree of notoriety, but will it be the right kind?

They have linked in everything possible in the article, except for the Playboy's web site.

I noticed the link to the Playboy was missing as well. Like I care. I have to agree with ImagiCreator in that she (Kyla Ebbert) is an attention whore. And where I know some guys appreciate the women of Playboy, it really doesn't take much talent to pose for them. I'm just sayin'.

I don't think talent is really what they're looking for.

It's stupid for her to have been thrown off a flight because of what she was wearing, does anyone honestly believe that what she was wearing was offensive? Someone just got pissed for one reason or another and decided to complain, then the airline had to do something about it, or maybe someone from the airline got pissed.

And as for those who think this is going to get in the way of her becoming a lawyer, I mean come on really? If she really goes for it, more power to her, but Playboy is full of women who call themselves future lawyers and veterinarians. This is a career move whether she realizes it or not.

I'd hit it,















with my truck.

Meh, you can't really blame her for milking this thing. She's just taking advantage of her 15 minutes of whoring out ... maybe she's not as stupid as she looks.

Yeah, cuz the cleavage, toothy grin and vacuous stare just SCREAM hidden intellect...

Wow, hard to understand all the venom.

She's just doing what most attractive women would do when the opportunity to make some easy money shows up.

A photoshoot lasting maybe 2 or 3 days and take home enough money for law school...kind of a no brainer.

Playboy is not exactly a scroungy girly magazine.

I agree, Playboy isn't trashy. BUT--when you get kicked off an airplane because they say you were dressed too sexy, picking up the catchphrase "Too sexy for Southwest, perfect for Playboy" does NOT help your case. Thinking that appearing semi nude in a magazine won't impact your career as a lawyer is absurd.

I was on her side until she did this. This is NOT what most attractive women would do, and it is sad that you think so poorly of women.

"Sure, I'll flash my ta-ta's and such if there's enough money involved."

Imagine what will happen if she ever gets into law school or becomes a lawyer...She'll be harassed no end...good career move for the money maybe, but for her image as a lawyer... FAIL...

These might be real. They may be fake, but you never know.

NSFW, obviously. Here only for the newsworthiness aspect:

Aren't we becoming a bit hysterical here?

You have somehow deduced that I think poorly of women? On the contrary. I think that everyone, including women, are entitled to take advantage of any good fortune that happens their way.

I don't know why anyone, except perhaps a few Puritans, who would become so upset at a woman who is beautiful enough for Playboy to offer a photo article for very good money.

I wouldn't condemn any woman who takes advantage of that unique and fairly temporary asset: beauty.

Thousands of women do this as models, both clothed and unclothed, in magazines, television and movies. Do you put them all down as below your moral standards?

In fact which one of us is thinking less of women?

Don't you think that is a tad prejudiced?