Love this.

But I really think it would be more effective for men.

HA!

/throws out all brocalli and switches to tea

I can't help but wonder if the female sex doctors are just trying to egg us on. I'm sure bigger is better to an extent, but I just don't see how a woman can physically withstand anything more than 6 inches. Aren't there like, intestines and stuff in the way? It just doesn't seem physiologically possible! 0__0

I understand Oysters work but only if you eat the shells too.

Psychology. Thinks it's better, so it is.

"to an extent" indeed. I assure you...for some women, there is more definitely such a thing as 'too big'. Length--depends on the parts in question. Hitting the cervix isn't common, and can be uncomfortable. However, the area in question is pliant--it really will stretch enough for a baby, and the 'bigger' in question may be more about girth than length. No man can match that.

They were missing one.

13. Rubbing Jerry520's baldspot will make one a better lover.

TRUE: Jerry520's baldspot contains a special enzyme that heightens the sense of touch, and makes one more aware of their lover, leading to a more satisfying sexual experience for both partners. It is better if both partners rub Jerry520's baldspot.

From experience, I can tell you that 7.5" is super. 6" is good, but 7.5" is super. And no, the intestines do not get anywhere near in the way; the cervix gets in the way. After that, the uterus gets in the way.

And if a woman can withstand a 10lb baby, I'm sure she can withstand (and enjoy) a monstrous, gigantic super penis.

Okay, I know the woman CAN do it, but why would you want to practice birth in this situation.

It's really hard not to call out something really offensive right now.

It's a Vagina, Not a Clown Car

TRUE: For most people this is correct, some people seem to be determined to spend most of their life pregnant and pumping out children.

eh ... i never measured my exboyfriend's penis, but i thought it was a good size. but he was a firm believer of penetrative intercourse being the ONLY way to properly pleasure a woman.

size doesn't mean d**k when the operator doesn't consider the person he's operating with.

Good so I don't have to worry about my penis anymore!

The oysters being an aphrodisiac is based on old-school concepts of sympathetic medicine... like effects like. Herbs and food etc would influence whichever part of your anatomy it resembled. Liverwort is good for your liver, so on and so forth.

Oysters.... well. Every opened up shellfish sideways?

I ate a bunch of mussels and clams yesterday. I kept laughing because they all looked like vaginas.

Huh?

Either say it or don't. Don't just talk about it saying it.

agreed. holding things in can't be good for your health.


and size totally does matter, unless the owner is terrible at what he(she/it, whatever) at the act itself.

The problem with this statement is that having sex in the pool or any watery environment greatly lowers the amount of lubrication that women (and men) have to use, as it all floats away. In fact underwater can be one of the more painful ways, eventually, to have sex.

Not horrible, but pay attention to the girl and whether she's enjoying it or not.

I tell my vegetarian girlfriend the oyster thing all the time...never works. Now I'll have to switch to green M&Ms.