"Expert" says that possessing child pornography does not a pedophile make : XML WIDGEThttp://www.plime.com/You can use this XML spec to create a desktop widget or other application (i.e. Flash visualization). Please share it with us in our forum and we'll link it here!en-us7998http://www.plime.com/plime-com/l/7998/1/<![CDATA["Expert" says that possessing child pornography does not a pedophile make]]> "Baillie told Crown prosecutor Jenny Rees labelling all kiddie porn collectors as pedophiles would be akin to saying anyone with illicit drugs is an abuser."
Comparing drugs to child porn? You're either USING it or DEALING it, either way.]]>4912/21/2006 10:54:32 AM2006-12-21T10:54:32+01:00
It's 100% free!Dumbass. Aside from the whole "you're not supposed to link to porn" issue and the whole "no spam-linking" rule; you posted this in a comment section about CHILD pornography.]]>3/9/2008 4:54:12 PM2008-03-09T16:54:12+01:00119945http://www.plime.com/l/7998/1/xml_widget.rss#q4<![CDATA[poimrtuy @ 10/16/2007 6:30:26 AM]]>10/16/2007 6:30:26 AM2007-10-16T06:30:26+01:0014472http://www.plime.com/l/7998/1/xml_widget.rss#q3<![CDATA[Boomshank @ 12/21/2006 11:25:27 AM]]> He's trying to smoke and mirror the fact that a collector of child porn is not an "abuser", which is correct (at least not directly). I'd argue that any collector of child porn *is* a pedophile in my book, which means that they're attracted to kids in the same way that most people are attracted to adults.
"6,200 images and 296 videos" looks like pretty conclusive proof of an interest in kids to me.]]>12/21/2006 11:25:27 AM2006-12-21T11:25:27+01:0014470http://www.plime.com/l/7998/1/xml_widget.rss#q2<![CDATA[HarmsyMcTwelve @ 12/21/2006 11:07:34 AM]]>12/21/2006 11:07:34 AM2006-12-21T11:07:34+01:00