Appeals Court rules that defendant DOES NOT have a right to a court appointed attorney
Appeals Court rules that defendant DOES NOT have a right to a court appointed attorney
Of course, the fact that he beat up the first attorney that was appointed 'may' have had some bearing on the decision. picked by tigertony 2 months ago
tags defendant beats attorney Minnesota William Lehman
281
 quote edit #1 
  comments (6)  share edit history (0)
< 1 >
19
 coldblad...
2 months ago
He does have a right to a court appointed attorney. To say otherwise is rediculous. Just make sure he's strapped down Hannibal style from now on.
57
quote #2
26
 Maven
2 months ago
He had one...I don't think there's any requirement that he get more than one because he freakedd out and beat the first one up.
67
quote #3
19
 coldblad...
2 months ago
Its too bad actually. With a better temperament he looks like he'd make a great Santa.
0
quote #4
18
 PulsisX
2 months ago
« coldbladed : Its too bad actually. With a better temperament he looks like he'd make a great Santa.
Actually it seems he has returned to the natural feral state of Santa. (link NSFW)
21
quote #5
About Plime
Plime is an editable wiki community where users can add and edit weird and interesting links. Users earn karma when other users vote on their actions. The more karma you have, the more power you have at Plime.
7
 ol1inch
2 months ago
I love the line "a defendant gives up his right to a court-appointed lawyer when he beats up the one he has".

I wonder where it is their legal system that says that.

LOL
57
quote #6
11
 digitalg...
2 months ago
pfft, he botched his own defense when he beat up his attorney in front of the jury for his ASSAULT TRIAL...
21
quote #7
+ add a comment
< 1 >

copyright Worth1000, LLC