Plime/121 Reasons The Stones Were Better Than The Beatles : ATOM 0.321 Reasons The Stones Were Better Than The Beatles : ATOM 0.3www.plime.complime@plime.com2008, www.plime.com.2008-12-03T03:43:40+01:00<![CDATA[21 Reasons The Stones Were Better Than The Beatles]]>517302008-02-22T15:10:24+01:002008-02-22T15:10:24+01:00
<![CDATA[suebe @ 2/22/2008 4:21:21 PM]]>207992 Please read the FAQs before posting to your blog. Blog postings in the news area ar...]]>2008-02-22T16:21:21+01:002008-02-22T16:21:21+01:00 Please read the FAQs before posting to your blog. Blog postings in the news area are frowned upon by the community. The FAQs will give you guidance on posting and where you can post your blog.
Look forward to more non-blog posts.
/oh, and The Beatles rock!]]><![CDATA[suebe @ 2/22/2008 4:18:41 PM]]>2079892008-02-22T16:18:41+01:002008-02-22T16:18:41+01:00<![CDATA[osiris12 @ 2/22/2008 4:11:32 PM]]>2079842008-02-22T16:11:32+01:002008-02-22T16:11:32+01:00<![CDATA[dOntEAtpOOp @ 2/22/2008 3:59:23 PM]]>207977 I've never understood the need to compare different bands, especially when they sound...]]>2008-02-22T15:59:23+01:002008-02-22T15:59:23+01:00 I've never understood the need to compare different bands, especially when they sound nothing alike.
I mean, I could see Pearl Jam being compared to Stone Temple Pilots (even though I feel they are both distinctly different, there are tons of similarities as well); but the Stones and the Beatles??? WTF?]]><![CDATA[bevissimo @ 2/22/2008 3:14:49 PM]]>207944 They just suck.]]>2008-02-22T15:14:49+01:002008-02-22T15:14:49+01:00 They just suck.]]>