http://www.plime.com/plime-com/en-usplime.com2008, plime.com.Plime/1http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rsshttp://www.plime.com/images/logo.gifhttp://www.plime.com/plime-com/http://www.plime.com/science/l/68907/1/http://www.plime.com/science/l/68907/1/plime.com

comments (3)   related   share   edit history (2)

< 1 >

(j/k..mostly)]]>http://www.plime.com/plime-com/l/68907/1/rss2_0.rss#q4http://www.plime.com/plime-com/l/68907/1/rss2_0.rss#q4plime.com http://www.plime.com/plime-com/l/68907/1/rss2_0.rss#q3http://www.plime.com/plime-com/l/68907/1/rss2_0.rss#q3plime.com There is an experiment, there are several possible conclusions. The paper mentions only one (see title). Experiment is not analyzed. Choice of participants is not analyzed.
It does not say how biased the experiments were.
It does not say what the alternative hypothesises were.
It is silent about the confidence level the experiments support their conclusion.
Looks like BS, but it could be true. There is no way to tell without further research.]]>http://www.plime.com/plime-com/l/68907/1/rss2_0.rss#q2http://www.plime.com/plime-com/l/68907/1/rss2_0.rss#q2plime.com