I'm saying "what if..." What if a naked child drops to the ground after their bath to pretend to be a dog.

Now whose talking maybes?

I assume, because of your username, that you've had a few different dogs in your life. They're all different. Some of them are super horny, some them are super "throw the ball", some are super lazy, etc, etc. I'm saying I don't want to take any chances by training a dog to f**k someone from behind, just in case they are one of the "super horny" dogs; which would transform them into (cue theme music) SUPER f**k DOGS.

The purpose of the bomb is still to explode. Whether or not it's set off is irrelevant.

Commenting != debating.

What's the purpose of training a dog to f**k people then? Is it still not trained to f**k people? Having said that, whether or not if f**ks people is irrelevant.

Seriously, how good would it be to name a band The Super f**k Dogs?!

I just said to the wifey, I wanna learn guitar just so I can form a band and call it that!

It's clear that I'm not going to convince you of anything regarding this matter.

You go on supporting dog f**king and see where that gets you in life.

I'd buy the T-Shirt for sure.

Like Mersh said, it was probably trained to do so with certain conditions, and most likely on command. I doubt very highly that a dog will run around looking for children to rape.

That said, for once, I agree with VexingMods. We're just beating a dead horse at this point. People f**k dogs, dogs f**k people. It's illegal, and yucky, but it shouldn't matter. To me, at least, it's not that big of a deal. If it's gonna be illegal, make it a misdemeanor. That's just my opinion.

*leaves thread*

Vexingmodtwo


Me

You

=

Me confused

Just wanted to say that it wasn't me that downvoted you.

Edit: You definitely aren't going to convince me of anything with this argument: "Ewww. Bestiality is gross."

"But, why?"

"Just 'cause. That's why."

"Sigh."

How do you know it was trained to do this on command? I didn't read that in the article. You're assuming that the "command" isn't just getting into the position. And I'm not suggesting it would be looking for children to rape, I'm sating that a dog does not distinguish between children and adults.

Hey, Mersh... Do you believe in this cause enough to hold a sign and protest? Just asking because envisioning you and a bunch of other people supporting the cause in a protest is making me laugh my ass off. It would be the creepiest protest of all time.

If you seriously think that the minuscule odds of something like that happening is enough to make it illegal, then pencils should be illegal as well. I mean, people could fall down and stab themselves in the brain! Hell, for that matter, forks should illegal. And knives. And really sharp sticks!

I would be inclined to say otherwise. There are quite a few physical differences between adults and children.

Of course it can, I have a dog, and whenever it's around my little brother (who's 1) it's a lot more gentle and cautious. With adults it plays a lot rougher. It knows the difference.

Of course it does. It's been exposed to a child. Dogs who been around childred tend to behave differently with them than those who have never been around children. They tend to be less patient and more "bitey".

Some dogs will hump any leg that comes near. Be it child or adult. Whose to say the same doesn't apply to intercourse?

You're back

Also, shouldn't that be, beating off over a dead horse?

Try taking a knife on a plane or into a government building and see how legal they are.

Inanimate objects aren't a fair comparison; as they have all been designed to do one or few specific tasks. Had they been designed to also have sex with humans, we might be able to compare them to these dogs.

One word, Dildos.

What? I was saying that many things are capable of doing things other than what they are made/trained/whatever to do. A dog trained to mount humans may (and I stress that may as much as humanly possible) accidentally mount a child as well as an adult, a pencil may be accidentally be used to stab one's own brains, and a blender may be accidentally used to blend one's own head with the family cat. These things are all highly unlikely though, and I don't think that it should be illegal to make a smoothie.

Ahem... the whole dog chasing child with pink boner thing was just a joke folks.

Since this has become the song that never ends, allow me to share my two cents (which would leave me with one cent).

Dog f*cking is wrong because:

1. There is a potential for physical damage to the dog (assuming you're "driving")

2. There is a much greater chance for venerial diseases (for both the dog and the human).

3. Training a dog to do this can create anti-social (aggressive) behavior in the animal IMO. That's why the "alpha male" of the pack gets to mate first!

(These animals are now being held in a shelter with the hope that they can be reintroduced into a home. Personally - I don't want either of these horn-dogs in MY house.)

4. And finally... this "act" can create DEEP psychological damage to the family member(s) who witness it and must cope with the reality. I don't know about you but if I found 150 movies of my mom and "lucky" doing the nasty - I'd need some counseling.

As Forest Gump says... "that's all I have to say about that"

[walks away with one penny]