Time for change : RSS 2.0

Time for change

Make sure to watch the whole thing.

roick @ 1/29/2008 5:45:01 PM

« genkan : Well, yes. But the artist name?

David Bowie

genkan @ 1/29/2008 11:47:52 AM

« michellu : Change, obviously.

Well, yes. But the artist name?

michellu @ 1/29/2008 11:44:45 AM

« genkan : This is a bit off topic, but what's the name of the song playing in the background?

Change, obviously.

genkan @ 1/29/2008 11:41:23 AM

This is a bit off topic, but what's the name of the song playing in the background?

Moe @ 1/28/2008 10:27:58 PM

Each and every one of these assh*les would admit to the Lincoln assassination if they thought it would get them votes.

They all say they want change...they all say they want a better America.

I say a better America is one which someone does not have to be a multimillionaire in order to seriously run for President. F*ck them all.

Oh, yea uber video! 8O)

dollyllama @ 1/28/2008 9:34:48 PM

« bunnysutra : My S/O and I were talking about that the other night. What IS change? Bush changed things. You can't say he didn't. So, what makes one think that the "changes" being sold in this campaign would be any "change-ee'r" and better?

Hrrrm.

And before I am ducking rotten tomatoes, I'm defining change as "not as it was before-- in a different state"

'Tis rhetoric. Now bahhhh like a good sheep (I mean no offense to you, just illustrating that this is how they view us).

chinook @ 1/28/2008 9:11:48 PM

« bunnysutra : And before I am ducking rotten tomatoes, I'm defining change as "not as it was before-- in a different state"

Sounds purtineer like the dictionary definition of change to me!

I was watching the Sask. provincial elections last November, and the [now ousted] premier kept trying to convince the province that 'change' was an awful thing, and that any change would be bad for the province. The leader of the opposition kept trying to convince the province that 'change' was needed, and that it would be a good thing.

I found it interesting, as the same word, and the same actions, could be viewed as both a positive and a negative thing.

Really, the more things change, the more things stay the same.

I guess 2pac sums my thoughts up quite nicely:

bunnysutra @ 1/28/2008 8:53:14 PM

My S/O and I were talking about that the other night. What IS change? Bush changed things. You can't say he didn't. So, what makes one think that the "changes" being sold in this campaign would be any "change-ee'r" and better?

Hrrrm.

And before I am ducking rotten tomatoes, I'm defining change as "not as it was before-- in a different state"

bevissimo @ 1/28/2008 8:49:05 PM

Awesome!

dollyllama @ 1/28/2008 8:40:18 PM

Ok, I was starting to get nauseas for a moment, then it went all awesome.