Because Racism is not yet Dead
Because Racism is not yet Dead
Republican Sen. Chris Buttars apologizes for a remark in which he compared Senate Bill 48 to a black baby, calling it “a dark, ugly thing.” picked by sparklyeyedgal181 5 months ago
tags racism braindead Chris Buttars Senate Bill 48
325
 quote edit #1 
  comments (12)  share edit history (0)
< 1 >
13
 ArchAnge...
5 months ago
Ironically, the republican party was formed to free the black slaves.

Just what they need, this racist f**ker.
112
quote #2
3
 abstemio...
5 months ago
"I apologize to the quorum, I apologize to anyone who took offense. In no way did I mean that to be degrading in any way."

Dear Sen. Buttars,

Your efforts to make an apology seem blatantly insincere, and sounds like a hollow attempt at saving your ass. At least, in expressing your bigotry, you are being true to yourself.

Keep it up, Butthole Buttars.
77
quote #3
11
 germz
5 months ago
Im so confused, what the f**k were they talking about black babies for?
43
quote #4
17
 sparklye...
5 months ago
« germz : Im so confused, what the f**k were they talking about black babies for?
The bill was about splitting school funds or something, so throughout deliberations, they kept referring to it as a baby (cause of the King Solomon story of cutting a baby in half).

Douchebag Buttars just decided to take it an extra step with a completely uncalled for racist remark.
43
quote #5
About Plime
Plime is an editable wiki community where users can add and edit weird and interesting links. Users earn karma when other users vote on their actions. The more karma you have, the more power you have at Plime.
1
 blingyin...
5 months ago
Everyone is racist to an extent, whether or not you're willing to admit it.

Maybe he didn't mean to have the racist insinuations everyone is interpreting from his comment. Black can mean a number of things outside of describing ones race. Maybe you're all racist by automatically assuming black refers to people of African descent considering the term black can be seen as derogatory.
58
quote #6
10
 tvirus
5 months ago
« germz:Im so confused, what the f**k were they talking about black babies for?
My guess is that he was actually thinking of the term "tar baby", which is used in politics to describe a sticky situation, although it isn't used much anymore because of its racist connotations.

But whatever he was trying to say it definitely wasn't appropriate.
47
quote #7
12
 thebluef...
5 months ago
I think there's a little too much speculation going on. The phrase uttered was, "This baby is black. It is a dark, ugly thing."

Now, to use the word 'baby' in place of something, especially something that you are creating, is commonly accepted. Now, 'black' not only refers to the color, or African-Americans. if one were to look up black in the dictionary, one would find that black can also mean something that is twisted, dishonest, dismal, stained, ill-boding, or immoral. In other words, something that is dark and ugly.

It seems rather more likely that Buttars made an unfortunate choice of words, especially seeing as other senators had compared to what they were doing to Solomon splitting babies.
75
quote #8
6
 nduanete...
5 months ago
You ever have one of those times where you say something, and you feel you've expressed yourself pretty well, but then you realize that the way you constructed your sentence could be totally misconstrued, and if someone were to take your word choice in the wrong way, there would be no way that you could convince them that what you really meant was not the horrible thing it may seem like you said? Is it possible that this happened here?

He didn't say, "this baby is African American." He said, "This baby is black. It is a dark, ugly thing." If you pop "black" into dictionary.com--oh, here I'll do it for you:



You'll see that there are 19 adjectival definitions for black, of which I'd say six or seven are possibly fitting interpretations. And one of those 19 is "African-American". Now, I'm not saying Buttars isn't a racist son of a b***h; I'm just saying there is a completely legitimate, non-racist interpretation of what he said, and sometimes we need to give people the benefit of the doubt.

EDIT: thebluefrog is apparently a faster typist than me. But obviously we're on the same wavelength. If I'd refreshed my page and seen what you posted, I wouldn't even have bothered. You expressed my thoughts very well!
40
quote #9
5
 jafo777
5 months ago
I also see how this comment is perhaps not racist. I see it as probably being an unfortunate choice of words, like bluefrog said.

kinda like when someone calls someone else "black" hearted...black-referring to someone's wicked disposition-not race
35
quote #10
10
 Matoogs
5 months ago
Yeah, I'm going with BlueFrog and duane on this. People are quick to attach a racial meaning to a famous person's words, and especially if he or she is a white republican.

He referred to the bill as 'baby' and called it "black" and "a dark, ugly thing". He never mentioned a black baby, nor did he use any explicitly racial terms.

Just another example of mincing a quote and then blowing it way out of proportion. Makes for a good headline I guess.
36
quote #11
10
 ZebraHDH
5 months ago
Apology accepted... you rascal!
13
quote #12
11
 germz
5 months ago
yea alot of the news needs more context to make knowledgeable understandings of what that person ment.
0
quote #13
+ add a comment
< 1 >

copyright Worth1000, LLC