They must be taking this seriously if they no longer give her direct access to him or his office.

It's a 4 page article that has four co-authors listed. Much of the detail is pretty specific.

I would expect the NY Times, particularly with the history of other stories of this nature exposed as being unverified in other media, to have checked this carefully before publication. If this is in any way pure speculation those reporters are finished.

I don't have a serious problem with politicians having sexual affairs but the Republicans should after the madness that followed Clinton's BJ.