Oh my gosh, no... talk about being a government puppet with someone else's agenda...

What.... all politicians?

I am not opposed to the idea.

She's young and probably has a fresher perspective on her parents' politics [which, in my opinion, aren't bad to begin with]. I would back Hillary over Obama if she didn't seem like so much of the same old stuff. At this point, I'm more interested in change than experience. I think Chelsea would rely on her parents' experience in the White House to an extent, but she'd also be more open to gearing things towards our generation and the future [moreso than, say, certain other offspring of past presidents, who are only interested in furthering Daddy's failed agenda].

When it comes to a female president, I'd pick her over her mama any day.

PILF?