Hillary Takes the Kid-Gloves Off Posted: 7 months ago by shep182
Hillary Clinton recently stated that if she were president, a nuclear attack by Iran on Israel would constitute a nuclear retaliation by the US.
Comments: 7 Score: [-] 151 [+].
< 1 >
Posted: 7 months ago by MeMe:
she didn't say we would use nuclear force against them she said we COULD obliterate them. That's a true statement. But saying we COULD, and drilling it into their heads is an attempt at keeping such an attack on Israel from happening.
Score: [-] 15 [+].
Posted: 7 months ago by shep182:
I'm not hating on Hillary with this, but its an importaint statement that needs coverage. It seems a tad premature for her to make this kind of statement, but she is taking the hardline since Obama is going for the soft-touch...
Score: [-] 37 [+].
Posted: 7 months ago by duditz:
the whole thing is pretty ridiculous..the entire reason anyone even owns a nuclear weapon is because we COULD blow your a** up..haven't we gotten over this??
..can't wait for nuclear winter.
Score: [-] 24 [+].
Posted: 7 months ago by 1thirteen3:
My question is why we're so intent on protecting Israel.
They have they're own freaking nukes! Why do we need to protect them?
Iran doesn't even have nukes, and they shut down their nuclear program years ago.
Why do we insist that Iran is actually a problem. Is this Iraq v. II?
Score: [-] 28 [+].
Posted: 7 months ago by mewhitenoise:
We should stop being Israel's big brother, it's so silly. Alliances like this always start ridiculous wars.
Score: [-] 12 [+].
Posted: 7 months ago by Mershaullk:
Nuclear holocaust FTW!
Score: [-] 0 [+].
Posted: 7 months ago by gammerus:
« 1thirteen3 : My question is why we're so intent on protecting Israel.
They have they're own freaking nukes! Why do we need to protect them?
Iran doesn't even have nukes, and they shut down their nuclear program years ago.
Why do we insist that Iran is actually a problem. Is this Iraq v. II? Exactly!
Score: [-] 12 [+].
< 1 >