http://www.plime.com/politics/en-ushttp://www.plime.com/politics/http://www.plime.com/politics/l/61831/1/

comments (16)   related   share   edit history (1)

< 1 >

http://www.plime.com/politics/l/61831/1/rss0_91.rss#q17

http://www.comedycentral.com/videos/index.jhtml?videoId=166019

]]>http://www.plime.com/politics/l/61831/1/rss0_91.rss#q16« JoshSF49 : You mean, like, Hillary?

Red State: Check (Arkansas)
Experience: Check (however many she says she has)
More Moderate: Check

Obama's too pompous to pick her, but she would certainly be his best choice.I think the nastiness between the two... will prevent that from even being a consideration. Furthermore, with so many Democrats angry with Hillary for staying in the race, and attacking her with everything they've got, I can't imagine a turnabout.

It might have been a really strong ticket a few months ago... but at this time, I doubt it would gain anything.]]>http://www.plime.com/politics/l/61831/1/rss0_91.rss#q15« JoshSF49 : Obama is ranked the #1 most liberal senator in the senate.

Hillary is ranked #15. Thus she is numerically more conservative than Obama.

But seriously, ImNotBlue described Hillary in their post, whether or not it was meant to or not.That doesn't exactly make her a moderate, just less liberal]]>http://www.plime.com/politics/l/61831/1/rss0_91.rss#q14« gammerus : Are you serious? Hillary is an evil b***h, that shouldn't even be senater let alone vp. She isn't more moderate, she is just more willing to act like a conservative.Obama is ranked the #1 most liberal senator in the senate.

Hillary is ranked #15. Thus she is numerically more conservative than Obama.

But seriously, ImNotBlue described Hillary in their post, whether or not it was meant to or not.]]>http://www.plime.com/politics/l/61831/1/rss0_91.rss#q13« JoshSF49 : You mean, like, Hillary?

Red State: Check (Arkansas)
Experience: Check (however many she says she has)
More Moderate: Check

Obama's too pompous to pick her, but she would certainly be his best choice.Are you serious? Hillary is an evil b***h, that shouldn't even be senater let alone vp. She isn't more moderate, she is just more willing to act like a conservative.]]>http://www.plime.com/politics/l/61831/1/rss0_91.rss#q12« ImNotBlue : To a degree I agree. And that's why I don't think that Edwards will get the VP nod. Maybe a cabinet space... but not the VP spot.

The big question is: What does an Edwards VP bring Obama? Nothing really in terms of big numbers. Experience, not really. Common-man appeal, certainly not. A different wing of his party, doubtful.

So then how does it hurt Obama? Well, Edwards has run for VP once already, and twice for President (and lost all of those, not a great record)... and the dossier on him is pretty thick. He's already been attacked for being elitist (expensive hair-cuts), opportunistic phony (see: "ambulance chaser"), and the weaker member of his family (IMO, Elizabeth is a better fighter than he). And since Obama has been attack for some of the similar things, this won't help the ticket seem any stronger.

So to me, an Edwards/Obama ticket just doesn't make much sense.

To play it smart, Obama would have to take an older politician... someone who will have the experience people say he lacks. They will be someone from the "red state" areas, and they will be a bit more moderate than Obama himself. This, of course, is the opposite of what McCain needs to do (younger, more conservative, and a pro in one particular area... probably the economy and finances).

But that's just my opinion.You mean, like, Hillary?

Red State: Check (Arkansas)
Experience: Check (however many she says she has)
More Moderate: Check

Obama's too pompous to pick her, but she would certainly be his best choice.]]>http://www.plime.com/politics/l/61831/1/rss0_91.rss#q11http://www.plime.com/politics/l/61831/1/rss0_91.rss#q10« coldbladed : In an Obama vs McCain election it will be the VPs that decide it imo.To a degree I agree. And that's why I don't think that Edwards will get the VP nod. Maybe a cabinet space... but not the VP spot.

The big question is: What does an Edwards VP bring Obama? Nothing really in terms of big numbers. Experience, not really. Common-man appeal, certainly not. A different wing of his party, doubtful.

So then how does it hurt Obama? Well, Edwards has run for VP once already, and twice for President (and lost all of those, not a great record)... and the dossier on him is pretty thick. He's already been attacked for being elitist (expensive hair-cuts), opportunistic phony (see: "ambulance chaser"), and the weaker member of his family (IMO, Elizabeth is a better fighter than he). And since Obama has been attack for some of the similar things, this won't help the ticket seem any stronger.

So to me, an Edwards/Obama ticket just doesn't make much sense.

To play it smart, Obama would have to take an older politician... someone who will have the experience people say he lacks. They will be someone from the "red state" areas, and they will be a bit more moderate than Obama himself. This, of course, is the opposite of what McCain needs to do (younger, more conservative, and a pro in one particular area... probably the economy and finances).

But that's just my opinion.]]>http://www.plime.com/politics/l/61831/1/rss0_91.rss#q9http://www.plime.com/politics/l/61831/1/rss0_91.rss#q8http://www.plime.com/politics/l/61831/1/rss0_91.rss#q7http://www.plime.com/politics/l/61831/1/rss0_91.rss#q6http://www.plime.com/politics/l/61831/1/rss0_91.rss#q5« browntrout : Like I said... "opportunist" ;)If I could vote I wouldn't vote for Obama if he picked Edwards as his running mate.

and no im not racist ;)]]>http://www.plime.com/politics/l/61831/1/rss0_91.rss#q4« coldbladed : That or "future Vice Presidential Nominee supports Obama"Like I said... "opportunist" ;)]]>http://www.plime.com/politics/l/61831/1/rss0_91.rss#q3http://www.plime.com/politics/l/61831/1/rss0_91.rss#q2