.....

.....


I think I recall reading something about all of those on Plime.

What can I say, ladies and gents; we rock!

The credibility was shot down in my mind by #18, "ZOMG 9/11 conspiracy!!!!!!!11!!1!!

Iran/Contra was called a conspiracy at one point also. I honestly don't have the ability to argue with his facts. And he's using science and logic to argue with the generally accepted notion.

I don't have an agenda either way. I don't beleive in the 'Bush bombed the WTC' or the 'space aliens bombed WTC' but I don't fully trust our government to tell us the whole truth.

Is it possible that the WTC housed explosives of some type and not just offices? Sure. Is it possible that the WTC had explosives brought in by 9/11 terrorists and that the plane crash was simply the catalyst as it was very public and more dramatic? Of course.

Just remember. A long time ago Gallileo was laughed at and considered a wingnut by his use of logic and science.

We don't need no stinking logic. Truthiness strikes again!